As we move through early 2026, the global defense industry is experiencing a historic surge in demand, a scale unseen for decades. Against a backdrop of escalating geopolitical tensions and a proposed U.S. defense budget that could reach a staggering $1.5 trillion by fiscal year 2027, major aerospace and defense contractors are commanding significant attention from investors. The debate for many often narrows to a head-to-head contest between two industry behemoths: Lockheed Martin (LMT) and Northrop Grumman (NOC).
While Lockheed Martin continues its reign as the undisputed revenue champion, largely powered by its massive F-35 program, Northrop Grumman has carved out a critical niche in next-generation strategic deterrence and space systems. Both companies recently posted robust quarterly earnings, yet their investment profiles are increasingly distinct. This analysis pits the two defense giants against each other to determine which presents the more compelling strategic position for portfolios in February 2026.
Financial Performance: Diverging Fundamentals
A review of the latest fundamental data, released in late January 2026 for Q4 and full-year 2025, reveals key differences between the two corporations.
| Metric | Lockheed Martin (LMT) | Northrop Grumman (NOC) |
|---|---|---|
| Market Capitalization | ~$146.4 billion | ~$100.1 billion |
| Share Price | ~$634.00 | ~$705.50 (Near All-Time High) |
| P/E Ratio (Trailing) | ~29.5x | ~24.2x |
| Dividend Yield | 2.10 % | 1.35 % |
| Revenue Growth (2025) | +6.0 % | +4.0 % |
| Order Backlog | $194 billion (Record) | ~$84 billion |
| 2026 Revenue Forecast | $77.5 – $80.0 billion | $43.5 – $44.0 billion |
| Operating Margin | ~11.5 % | ~10-11 % |
Key Takeaways: Lockheed Martin provides the more attractive income profile with its yield above 2%, appealing to dividend-focused investors. In contrast, Northrop Grumman shares have demonstrated stronger price momentum, reaching fresh all-time highs in February 2026. From a valuation perspective, LMT trades at a premium P/E multiple. This reflects its status as a sector “safe haven” and the high visibility of its future cash flows, backed by a colossal $194 billion backlog.
Core Strategies: Volume Versus Next-Gen Technology
Although both firms primarily serve the Pentagon, their strategic focuses represent two different philosophies within the defense sector.
Lockheed Martin’s identity is anchored in air dominance and conventional firepower. Its Aeronautics segment, led by the F-35 Lightning II stealth fighter, contributes approximately 40% of total revenue. However, the company’s Missiles and Fire Control (MFC) division has emerged as a critical growth engine. Systems like the PAC-3 and THAAD interceptors and the HIMARS launcher are seeing unprecedented demand, fueled by ongoing conflicts that have renewed the global focus on conventional munitions.
Northrop Grumman positions itself as a technological pioneer in strategic deterrence and space. Its portfolio is more heavily weighted toward next-generation platforms than existing ones. The company is currently executing two of the Pentagon’s most crucial programs: the B-21 Raider stealth bomber and the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile (ground-based strategic deterrent). Furthermore, Northrop’s Space Systems segment is a dominant player in satellite constellations and launch vehicles, betting directly on the increasing militarization of space.
Recent Catalysts and Market Moves
The news flow in late January and early February 2026 proved pivotal for both stocks, setting the tone for the coming months.
Lockheed Martin: Production Surge and Earnings Beat
On January 29, 2026, Lockheed reported Q4 results that exceeded analyst forecasts, with earnings per share (EPS) of $5.80 (versus $5.75 expected) on revenue of $20.3 billion. Shares advanced over 5% on the news.
* Major Development: The company announced a framework agreement with the U.S. Department of Defense to quadruple production capacity for THAAD interceptors. This signals a strategic shift from mere “inventory drawdown” to a massive “stock replenishment,” directly benefiting the missiles segment.
* Growth Confirmation: Full-year 2025 revenue hit $75 billion, a 6% increase, confirming management’s success in overcoming past supply chain constraints.
Northrop Grumman: Record Highs on Strategic Execution
Northrop Grumman also delivered a strong report on January 30, posting EPS of $7.23 against a forecast of $6.99.
* Market Reaction: The stock climbed to a new all-time high of $705.50 on February 3, 2026. Investors applauded the firm’s ability to maintain margins despite cost pressures in the complex B-21 program.
* Space & Rockets: Northrop highlighted sustained demand for solid rocket motors—a critical component for both military missiles and launch vehicles. Its 2026 outlook points to mid-single-digit growth, supported by the maturing B-21 production line.
Industry Context:
Both companies are navigating a complex political landscape. Early February reports suggest the U.S. government is pressuring defense contractors to prioritize capital expenditures (CapEx) for factory output over share buybacks. While this may pressure free cash flow in the short term, it strengthens long-term revenue streams.
Future Outlook: Contrasting Pathways
Lockheed Martin: The Volume Play
LMT’s strategy for 2026-2027 can be summarized in one word: volume. With the F-35 now widely adopted by NATO and allied nations, the export market remains robust. The primary catalyst, however, is the missiles segment. As global inventories of Patriots and GMLRS (guided rockets) require replenishment, Lockheed’s high-margin production lines are running at capacity. Its forecast of up to $80 billion in 2026 revenue demonstrates strong confidence in supply chain stabilization.
Northrop Grumman: The Long-Term Bet
NOC is playing a longer game. The B-21 Raider is slated for service entry later this decade, but the revenue ramp is already underway. The company’s role in the Sentinel program (replacing the Minuteman III) is a massive, though politically sensitive, revenue driver worth hundreds of billions over its lifecycle. Additionally, Northrop is a prime beneficiary of the new space race, developing satellite architectures for missile warning and tracking that are set to become standards for the U.S. Space Force.
Opportunities and Risks: A Side-by-Side View
| Company | Opportunities (Upside) | Risks (Downside) |
|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin | • Dominance in tactical missiles (HIMARS, JASSM) • Secured F-35 cash flows (multi-decade visibility) • Higher potential for dividend growth |
• Cost overruns on F-35 engine upgrades • Regulatory pressure over pricing • Inflation risks on fixed-price contracts |
| Northrop Grumman | • Monopoly on next-gen stealth bomber (B-21) • High exposure to Space Force budget growth • Long-term nature of the Sentinel program |
• Intense scrutiny of Sentinel costs/delays • Lower dividend yield by comparison • Execution risk on complex new technology |
Technical Perspective
- LMT: The share price broke out of a consolidation pattern following the Q4 report, overcoming resistance at $630. It currently trades above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, signaling a clear uptrend. Solid support has formed near $600, with the next targets at previous highs around $645.
- NOC: The stock is trading in “blue sky” territory at all-time highs above $705. However, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is approaching overbought levels, suggesting potential for short-term consolidation or a pullback. The high trading volume accompanying the breakout confirms institutional investor conviction.
Final Verdict: Choosing Between Stability and Growth
The choice between Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman in 2026 heavily depends on an investor’s time horizon and risk tolerance.
Lockheed Martin remains the portfolio fortress. It offers a superior dividend yield, a record $194 billion backlog, and benefits directly from the global rearmament happening right now (missiles and munitions). LMT is the sector’s classic “cash cow,” promising stability and immediate cash flow visibility.
Northrop Grumman is the growth engine. With its leadership in space and strategic deterrence (modernizing the nuclear triad), the company is arguably better positioned for the wars of the future than the conflicts of today. Its recent breakout to record highs reflects the market’s willingness to pay a premium for this long-term technological moat.
For a balanced defense allocation, one could argue that Lockheed provides the foundation, while Northrop offers the ceiling. Currently, Northrop shows stronger price momentum, yet Lockheed appeals to conservative investors with its more attractive valuation metrics and reliable income stream.
Ad
Lockheed Stock: Buy or Sell?! New Lockheed Analysis from February 4 delivers the answer:
The latest Lockheed figures speak for themselves: Urgent action needed for Lockheed investors. Is it worth buying or should you sell? Find out what to do now in the current free analysis from February 4.
Lockheed: Buy or sell? Read more here...
